Sunday, 22 March 2015

Targeting Millennial: The New 4Ps of marketing

Much of our marketing know-how has revolved around placing the right product at the right place at the right price by using the right promotion techniques. We have laden our notebooks with a plethora of numerics involving the cost benefit analysis or in simple words how much profit if at all will all the expenditures incurred result in.
Starting from the promotion debacle of “nirdosh” we have in the initial parts of our MBA lives come to the marketing of “water chromatography”. Somewhere in between we learnt about how we need to position the product, whom should we target and the various pricing options that are available to us. There were many other things too that we failed to notice or if we did, we did not really pay enough attention to them. We built brands but we did not realize what these were made of; was this a single product or a gamut of them, how close did we bring our product to the customer, that entering into a price war wasn’t the only solution and sometimes charging high worked in our favour; and last but not the least, when the product was launched, did the firm go to sleep or was it then that the marketing actually began.
We do not position ourselves above Jerome McCarthy but we definitely can question the relevance of the 4Ps he gave in 1960 in the present world. With India counting among the youngest nations of the world the consumer behaviour is experiencing drastic changes. The Gen-next does not believe in the stereotypical branding and is out to explore while simultaneously maintaining an eye for the brands. The buying power has increased but the economy is still not very stable and so people still prefer durability over luxury. In such a market full of parallel contradictions, there is a need to improvise on the 4Ps.
The new 4Ps can be Portfolio, Positioning, Proximity and Public Relations with the ever changing demands of the Millennials; the reasons for the same are explained further.




PORTFOLIO
Portfolio for us replaces the traditional Kotler defined first P denoting Product. Why portfolio? The simple answer is that some things everywhere beat everything somewhere. Before going into the nitty-gritty of why Portfolio Management:
A product is any offering that can satisfy a need or want, such as one of the 10 basic offerings of goods, services, experiences, events, persons, places, properties, organizations, information, and ideas.
In short, a product satisfies the consumer’s needs. Needs are varied and they keep changing over time. Many times there is a latent need which is pricked out from its slumber and results in high market potential. Now, since the needs are varied, a successful product should satisfy all of them ideally. However, since ideal does not exist, there will always be something that a product will lack and hence pave way for a new product in the market.
A new product from a new firm would eat into the former’s market share and result in reduced price margin. It might also be a possibility that the customer who has switched to the new product/brand never returns to the previous product and hence the latter loses it completely.

How to retain such customers? The most common answer would be to vary the pricing strategy or innovate. Sadly though, innovation comes with a price attached to it and any change in production method would only result in additional costs.
Many managers are of the view that a cost benefit analysis of the same would give us the best possible solution; however this marketing myopia is precisely the reason why wrong decisions are taken.

Let us have a look on some examples:
·         Ever wondered why P&G launched Tide as a detergent specifically for white clothes while it already had Ariel as a top brand in the segment?
·         Why did L’Oreal launch Garnier brand of products targeting the comparatively lower salary segments when it was doing well enough?
·         HUL is in literal sense a house of brands where it has multiple brands for a single line e.g. Lux, Liril, Hamam etc.

The answer to all of the above without any exception is to capture additional market and to churn extra revenues. But what is the need to capture additional markets when a suitable pricing strategy can get the additional revenue for us.
Well, like it was mentioned before, the ideal does not exist and there will always be some need or want that will be left unsatisfied. It is to enter into these new markets does a brand expands.

Portfolio extension definitely needs a huge capital investment but sticking to a single product ultimately leads to stagnation of market for the company.
It is thus advisable that the firms should after setting up their brand invest in the image/portfolio expansion.
An expansion in the portfolio will be easier compared to the initial brand launch because it will have an established name attached to it and hence people will be able to relate to it better. Also, new market will also be exploited for opportunities and if the brand lives up to the standards, it can own a considerable market share in whichever target audience it chooses.

PROXIMITY
When we talk about proximity in terms of marketing, it goes without saying that in today’s world internet is the nearest market place available to the customers. ‘Place’ in old 4Ps of marketing has been replaced with ‘Proximity’ with the advent of internet. Internet has made it possible for the customers to access the market which is just a click or a touch away from them. It’s all about Proximity now! How can a brand at the precise moment cater to the needs or wants of the customers is something that the companies have to ensure to stay at par with the competitors. Needless to say that Flipkart, Amazon, Snapdeal, Myntra and many such e-commerce websites are thriving on this need that was once latent-the need to get everything on a click. Think of the supreme ecstasy many of us feel when we find an online store which promises home delivery as well. “Ekstop” filled this gap of going to the market and buying basic home requirements and the growth in its consumer base has been no prizes for guessing, exemplary.
The young generation has money in its hands. This generation lives in the present unlike their parents who had the onus of building the future for them. So, people like you and me do not really think before spending, if there is something they like and it is well within the reach, why wait for someone else to go and pick it up; let it be ours. What we want is least of the movement and most of the work and online orders and deliveries are doing just that for us.
Let us discuss the case of food outlets like McDonald’s, Dominos and Pizza Hut. All the three food outlets have a very good presence in almost every city which seemed to be a potential target segment. Their food joints are always brimming with customers enjoying inside and waiting outside in queues but still they had to venture online. The reason is simple, who would not want to add more to its customer base. And plus, when you do not want to get ready to go out and do not want to cook either, ordering online is the best option. And not only these big food giants, various sites such as “food panda” have also emerged which provide a multitude of options to chose from on the same page. What more could a person ask for?
An average Internet user spends around 5 hours a day on internet, a well strategically placed content can thus increase the visibility to the potential clients. This is precisely the reason why Facebook started the “Facebook ads” business. Many small and medium enterprises have benefitted from it by reaching out to the customers far and wide.
POSITIONING
The biggest war between brands that the market has ever seen is the price war! The pricing strategies aimed at gaining market share by reducing that of the competitor’s has worked but only in the short run; in the long run the profits of all have suffered. The almost defunct Spicejet, the already shut Kingfisher and the loss making others are the best examples to quote.
Reducing prices has been the traditional way of market capturing and it seems so obvious to all that even the initial marketing lectures have the prospective managers vouching for a price reduction. Southwest Airlines when faced such a threat from Brainiff International and Trans Texas Airways who reduced their flight ticket to $13 did not really go for a price cut. It instead offered a regular $26 flight laden with goodies and a cheaper $13 one. Contrary to what we might expect, 80% of the people went for $26 flight. This clearly states the fact that the people who are ready to pay would prefer better services rather than saving money.
Thus it is clear that if a brand positions itself well and earns the trust of its customers, prices would never be an issue for it and its profitability will never be affected in the long run. If we consider the luxury clothing brands like Diesel and Armani; they don’t have to worry about the pricing of their products. Customers are willing to pay premium prices for their products without doing any cost benefit analysis.
Levi’s launched brands like Dockers, Sykes and Levi’s Signature in the Indian market to cater to the different income groups but all of them failed because Levi’s had already been positioned as a premium brand and the price cut brought the image of reduced quality for the Indian masses who generally relate price and quality proportionally. If we consider an automobile brand like Audi then the image that comes to our mind is that even the cheapest car would not cost less than 20 lacs. So, even if they come up with a new model which can be sold for around 15 lacs they would not do it to keep up with their image.
Moreover, since the generation is becoming more brand centric and is willing to pay for the brands, the main strategy for a firm should be to decide on the segment which it needs to target and then position itself in that segment followed by zeroing on the right pricing instead of doing it the other way around.
 
                                                                                                                                                 
          

PUBLIC RELATIONS

Many of us must have read the Harrah’s Case. The key idea of the case was how Customer Relationship Management is integral to a firm’s growth. In the case, we saw that how by knowing their customers Harrah’s could overturn its business into a profit making venture. The casino chain came up with the idea of “luck fairies” that would go to the customers who were losing repeatedly and gift them holiday or dinner packages. In a nutshell Harrah’s made appoint to know their customer just like a family and then follow this strategy religiously.

We are usually found recommending Dell to our friends who want to buy new laptops. There are other players like SONY, HP, HCL etc. who have technologies at par but what gives DELL an edge is the after sales service that it provides. No matter what technical issue you have, you can always and at any point of time get your warranty extended (terms and conditions applied) or ask for direct technical help. A DELL serviceman never takes more than 3-4 business days to get your issue corrected and that too if the issue has not been already corrected online.

Except for the manufacturing sector, CRM installation growth has been meteoric in all the other sectors. This is because in a B2C environment, the end customer is the primary customer as well. How will the market react to a product depends on the level of trust the customers show in the brand image. Any negativity in the market may reflect poorly in the sales. If we have a look at the Piggly Wiggly stores’ history then we would be able to understand even better that how public relation management can work wonders as well as spell disaster. The stores founded in 1916 by Clarence Saunders were the reason behind the last great corner. Saunders showed exemplary public relations handling and mobilized the people of his native Memphis to work for him. However, the disaster occurred when even though the people were working for him, he started spending on building a palace for him.

The difference might not be very stark in the FMCG sector when we look at the end consumer but a very critical application of public relations management lies in the supply chain itself. The firms provide the retailers and/or distributors with periodic discounts, free gifts or provide packages to them so as to maintain good relations with them. Not only this, the retailers are also involved in demand analysis either directly or indirectly which gives the latter a sense of importance and provides a feel good factor.

David Oglivy rightly said, “The customer is not a moron, she is your wife” and we all know that an angry wife spells doom. Your customer will always be ready to buy your product if he is satisfied with the after sales service that you offer. It is a no brainer that you have a deliver a good product but then the story doesn’t end there. This is where exactly the things start and whether this newly found relationship will continue or not depends on how you treat them.


As Peter Drucker said, The aim of marketing is to understand the customer so well the product or service fits him and sells itself”. Beyond this nothing needs to be said.

(This piece wasn't my work alone. Thanks ! Varun Bhargava for collaborating on the same.)

Friday, 20 March 2015

Theory of Common Sense in Decision Making

I get fascinated by so many theorems/theories doing rounds. No matter which subject you choose or what specialization you intent to do, you will always have theorems/theories at your disposal.
A fine Sunday morning, I decided that I need to propound a theorem too. Now, since I am no researcher and my management skills are as strong as a two year experienced five months into MBA person, I would clarify that what you will get to read ahead might not be high on jargons but you would definitely get a dose of common sense.
Let me call my theory as the Theory of Common Sense Involving Decisions or to cut it short, the TCSID (you weren’t expecting a better name; were you?)
As the guy with a funny hairy woolen hat said, Common Sense is not so common; I believe him, but I would add that it gets all the more uncommon with the degree of numbers that get into our mind.
I have seen that managers get so fascinated by numbers that they forget to catch the core idea of the problem. All of the energies get wasted in number crunching to prove that the said cost benefit analysis supports their views. Then there are the organizational biases that creep in where personal or group opinions are given priorities over what is exactly right.
While taking all these decisions, there is something that we actually miss on and that is COMMON SENSE. I am not a finance person because I am predominantly a marketing one so what I am going to write ahead will be more relevant to marketing professionals.
Marketing is all about understanding the customers and taking decisions accordingly. What is a market; it is definitely not as complicated as the big definition by Kotler, it is simply US, THE PEOPLE.
Understanding how we will behave when offered something is the key to making right decisions. And we certainly do not need calculations for that. Our calculations are based on assumptions and these assumptions are solely based on our common sense. We understand and form opinion about people because of our common sense, we certainly do not get into calculations of if x is equal to y then z is a spendthrift.
Observations are based out of our sense and if they are right, we make the right assumptions, our calculations go perfect and we achieve the target.
Even Raghuram Rajan says that the decisions taken are based on his observations of the Indian Economy and the gut feeling and definitely not the IS-LM curves that we study in Macroeconomics.
In a nutshell, even though common sense is not so common, it isn’t so uncommon. It is very much there, what misses is the realization of its being and the acceptance of over fascination with numbers.
Find and accept the two and you will make the best of the decisions for yourself and the firm.



The Buridan's Ass

I am not very sure about the percentage of readers who know about the Buridan’s Ass concept. Let me assume that the ratio of knowing it is 50-50. Now since 50% know about it already, I should not write an article about the Buridan’s Ass and its implications but, 50% are still unaware about what it is and so I should go about writing on it. The question is what should I do?
Well let the Buridan’s Ass explain it for you. The theory satirizes French philosopher Jean Buridan’s philosophy of moral determinism. Though moral determinism is not what we will be talking about here, but rationalism and the market will definitely be an interesting aspect of it.
A Buridan’s Ass is one who is equally hungry and thirsty and has a stack of hay and a pill of water kept on his either sides at equal distances between which he has to choose just one. Now, ideally he should make a choice and move but then what happens in reality is that he gets confused and dies.
Doesn’t appeal to our rational minds, right? Ok! So let us suppose you love “rajma” and “kadhi” equally and you have both of them in front of you. What would you eat; remember that you like both of them equally. You certainly do not make a choice because you cannot decide which one to take.
This was the funnier part of it, now applying it to the market scenario; a Buridan’s Ass is the main reason why companies project their points of difference most in an advertisement and why two exactly similar products do not exist.
We usually talk about the first mover’s advantage, but have we ever thought of the Second Mover’s Honeymoon and most importantly the Third Mover’s disaster! The reason for the disaster is that the consumer is already so confused between the first two options that a similar third fails to catch the eye. To exemplify, Tide was launched primarily as a detergent for white clothes because Surf Excel and Ariel were already reigning in the coloured clothing segments.
To avert the disaster, it is thus advisable not to launch till you have something that is totally a new concept and please, a new concept is not a bigger mobile phone size (till it’s Apple) or rounded edges of the body. This is primarily the reason why it is said that the mobile industry is in for an almost flat growth curve and price wars have started. Xiaomi and Micromax have captured the market solely because they have differentiated on the basis of price, the technology being more or less the same.

The takeaway is, innovation is the essence of survival in the market. If you cannot; the customer will act like the Buridan’s Ass but YOUR product will die.